Search for: "United States v. John" Results 3981 - 4000 of 11,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2012, 8:09 am by Jeralyn
Thomas could not offer the United States District Court jury his opinion on the legality of the contributions. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm by Mark Tushnet
It too would be determined in each state by the state's own processes, subject perhaps to the possibility, flagged in the literature on Powell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 7:59 pm by Michael Atkins
If there is no in personam jurisdiction in any judicial district of the United States, the owner may proceed in rem against the allegedly infringing domain name. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
We’ll continue to follow Freshwater’s suit, all the way to the United States Supreme Court, where the constitutional issues it presents will inevitably be decided. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:05 pm
   As Wikipedia explains, pendent jurisdiction is theauthority of a United States federal court to hear a closely related state law claim against a party already facing a federal claim, described by the Supreme Court as `jurisdiction over nonfederal claims between parties litigating other matters properly before the court. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:59 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  To that end the United Nations appointed John Ruggie as a Special Representative for the purpose of developing a substantive framework that would recognize the duties of states to protect human rights, an autonomous responsibility of enterprises to respect human rights and a joint obligation to develop remedial capacity with respect to breaches of these duties and responsibilities. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am by Conor McEvily
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
United States by an equally divided court. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm by Wells Bennett
  The government shouldn’t punish individuals for engaging in First Amendment activity, Trout argued, but the Identities Act does just that, by allowing conviction without a showing of the defense’s intention to harm the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:08 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Republican candidates pledge not to appoint “activists,” and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton apparently pledged to pick justices who would commit to overturning Citizens United. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:06 pm by Harry Styron
On advice of its attorney, the Robinwood South Community Improvement District refused to provide a copy of a settlement agreement to John P. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:06 pm by Harry Styron
On advice of its attorney, the Robinwood South Community Improvement District refused to provide a copy of a settlement agreement to John P. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:06 pm by Harry Styron
On advice of its attorney, the Robinwood South Community Improvement District refused to provide a copy of a settlement agreement to John P. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:51 am by John Lewis
The New York Times’ article also quoted Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit writing in Randall v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]