Search for: "United States v. New York"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 16,006
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
New York. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In 2011 Plaintiff obtained employment as a substitute teacher with another School District [District] in New York State;3. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In 2011 Plaintiff obtained employment as a substitute teacher with another School District [District] in New York State;3. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie chronicles the recent maneuvering and “histrionics” over whether “New York City’s altered legal terrain will be enough to erase” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
Considering certain arguments advanced by a petitioner for a new trial following an adverse decision
12 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The district court's evidentiary rulings.The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, said that such ruling are reviewed for abuse of discretion, citing Manley v. [read post]
Considering certain arguments advanced by a petitioner for a new trial following an adverse decision
12 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The district court's evidentiary rulings.The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, said that such ruling are reviewed for abuse of discretion, citing Manley v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Heller in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
This tradition is a byproduct of the complicated history of marriage in the United States, in which the civil and religious components of marriage have been intermingled. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:17 pm
The New York Times details how the plan initially came together but ultimately failed. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The United States District Court, Southern District of New York, affirming an order of the magistrate judge, rejected the Members' claim that they were entitled to legislative immunity that protects them against being called as witnesses at depositions regardless of whether they are parties in the action and directed the Members to appear for their depositions. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
Protecito0n form unlawful interference states the obvious--and it adds little to the duty of states to force them to declare that they will do what they are constitutionally burdened with doing. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
New York State Comptroller Thomas Dinapoli issued the following audits and reports during the week ending September 6, 2019. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 1:13 pm
In United States v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
(Although Clayton County is a government entity, Bostock for some reason did not bring a constitutional claim under the Fourteenth Amendment--his allegations were limited to Title VII.)Donald Zarda, an openly gay man, worked as a skydiving instructor for Altitude Express, Inc., a New York company doing business on Long Island. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm
For those not within the United States, some individuals with substantial connections to the United States may have some protection. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a well-considered opinion in Karem v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:34 am
New York & Co., Inc., August 8, 2019, Carney, S.). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
Some platforms have adopted “fact-checking” approaches, flagging information as disputed or supplying more information to put posts in context.[7] Platforms may seek to reduce the distribution of false information as part of its algorithmic approach to prioritizing content, such as in displaying news feeds or search results.[8] Platforms also, of course, already act on false information that may violate other rules of the platform such as spam, harassment,… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:50 pm
United States 19-107Issue: Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct underlying a charge of which the defendant was acquitted by a jury. [read post]
