Search for: "White v. United States" Results 3981 - 4000 of 7,207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm by Quinta Jurecic
More trouble than training, really: A Pentagon spokesman stated that under 200 moderate Syrian rebels are currently being trained by the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:54 am by Joe Consumer
Three years later, “a South Carolina jury award[ed] the largest judgment ever against a hate group in Macedonia v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:05 pm by Joy Waltemath
Additionally, although HCPD selected a retired Secret Service agent, he was not a proper comparator in terms of showing pretext since the record revealed that he worked at a desk job investigating white collar crime and was not out in the community. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm by Quinta Jurecic
United States, arguing that the majority took too narrow a view of Congress’s Article I authority over military commissions. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Even so, the fact that the United States government is looking for vendors to sell it software vulnerabilities isn’t news—we’ve known for some time that the government uses software vulnerabilities, sometimes known as zero-days, for offensive intelligence-gathering and espionage. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 2:19 pm by Tamara Tabo
If recent efforts from federal prosecutors are any indication, one of the most dangerous criminal profiles in America includes some or all of the following: white, male, libertarian, computer-savvy, critical of the status quo. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Jim Gerl
See, Dear Colleague Letter 114 LRP 1091 (US DOE & DOJ 1/8/14)  The United States Departments of Education and Justice issued policy guidance for school districts and states to reduce unlawful discrimination in student discipline policies. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm by D. Daxton White
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 83 (2002), the United States Supreme Court determined that the predecessor NASD six year rule was a procedural matter that is presumptively for this Panel to decide and is not a substantive limitation. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court notes that "The government argues on behalf of all but one defendant that a per se “two‐minute rule” derived from United States v. [read post]