Search for: "v. JONES"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 9,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Latsis thirty-percent rule—that, ordinarily, a qualifying “seaman” under the Jones Act must spend thirty percent or more of his time in service of a vessel in navigation—a court may consider the time a [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Jones Day blog post on In re Lett. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Jones Day blog post on In re Lett. [read post]
Oral Argument Preview: Warrantless GPS Tracking Device, Revisited. State of Ohio v. Sudinia Johnson.
16 Sep 2014, 8:32 am
Jones, 132 S. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Jones, General Counsel of Strayer University on the significance of Bolling v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Cartwright-Jones, Damian A. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 11:33 am
Jones In Fire Fighters Local 3564 v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:01 am
Key Precedent Illinois v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:04 am
The case of Skye v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:38 am
The court noted, however, that the employer agreed that the employee was entitled to a commission and that it expected the employer to “follow through on its representations” (Karlen v Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc, September 9, 2014, Kelly, J). [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:36 pm
Jones, Case 09-11551-MGW (Bankr. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
§ 2254(g) and Jones v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:58 am
Neth.), with introductory note by Amir ČengićJones and Others v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 6:30 am
In his recent decision in the Tioga County case of Maser v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
In Fraser v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:03 am
The three men’s new petition to the Supreme Court in the case of Jones v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This one is Chanel Inc. v Chanel’s Salon and Chanel Jones, 2:14-cv-00304, and sees fashion and cosmetics company Chanel as plaintiff. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:40 pm
"Filed 09/03/14, No. 13-1089Kimberlee Williams v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:36 am
” Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
The case is Chanel Inc. v. [read post]
