Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 7,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 8:46 am
(Scalia is referring to all the constitutional Free Exercise cases as well as the RFRA cases, because RFRA expressed the legislative intent to restore the kind of religious exemptions analysis that the Supreme Court seemed to be using before a case — Smith — that said the Free Exercise clause doesn't require exemptions from neutral, generally applicable laws.)Verrilli must concede that there are no cases that say that a for-profit enterprise cannot even make a… [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:13 am
The Reed Smith Health Industry Washington Watch blog has been updated to report on recent health policy developments, including the following: Regulatory Developments. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 2:32 am
The application for a stay was opposed on the basis that, apart from the fact that the applications for licences had been made in a slipshod and misleading way and the stay was applied for late, although the infringement proceedings had been brought against Raine personally the applications to the tribunal had been in his companies' names and there would be a duplication in costs in bringing the tribunal applications.Stephen Smith QC granted Raine's… [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:34 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
Smith (1990), the Supreme Court changed its mind, by a 5-to-4 vote. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
Smith. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:13 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2013 WL 6157587 at *3-*4 (S.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 6:12 am
For one thing it’s more or less a rehash of a post by Jeff Orenstein, one of Reed Smith’s regulatory enforcement types, on one of the firm’s “branded” blogs. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:56 pm
Category: 103 By: Eric Paul Smith, Contributor TitleApple Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
., a position with which the Copyright Office expressed agreement last week when it denied Garcia’s copyright registration application.)So, the majority continues: if Garcia made an independently copyrightable contribution to a joint work (I think this must mean “work,” because it would seem to be true whether the work is single-authored, joint, or WFH), she can retain a copyright interest in that contribution even if she’s not a joint author. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Section 15-48-130(a)(2), the Court decided to look to federal applications of “evident partiality” (as the language in FAA –Section 9 U.S.C. 10(a)(2)- is similar). [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm
Section 15-48-130(a)(2), the Court decided to look to federal applications of “evident partiality” (as the language in FAA –Section 9 U.S.C. 10(a)(2)- is similar). [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 10:51 am
Coble, 351 N.C. 448, 449 (2000); see generally Jessica Smith, North Carolina Crimes 67-70 (7th ed. 2012). [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:02 am
I just finished a new paper with economist Adam Smith (no, not that one) “Behavior, Paternalism, and Policy: Evaluating Consumer Financial Protection. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
Smith, (California Supreme Court 2004) 32 Cal.4th 792, 11 Cal.Rptr.3d 290, 86 P.3d 348.) [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 6:43 am
Firstly, the application must be made to either a Magistrate's court or the High Court. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 7:19 am
Smith case. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Glaxo Smith Kline Healthcare, 2006 WL 952032 (N.D. [read post]
