Search for: "C & S Company, Inc." Results 4001 - 4020 of 7,878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
Failure to establish and implement a proper lifting plan c. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:40 am
 Genericide Is No Laughable Matter Trade Mark Dilution ClaimPlaintiff also claims that Defendant’s unauthorized use of the famous crayola trade mark dilutes it, in violation of Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:59 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
In addition, the Third District Court of Appeal further noted that forum selection provisions are considered prima facie valid and enforceable, see Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:40 am
Athearn, supra (quoting Georgia Code § 9-11-56(c)). [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
I used to term this period as the elephant’s gestation period! [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 12:05 pm by Paul Caron
Malone in a position to reduce his companys tax bill. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:55 am by Kevin LaCroix
These moves followed quickly after the Delaware Supreme Court’s May 2014 ruling in the ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:25 am by Veronika Gaertner
 Martin Gebauer: “The Autocomplete Features of „Google“ and the Infringement of Personality Right – Jurisdiction to Adjudicate and Choice of Law” In its recent “Google”-decision, the German Federal Supreme Court (FSC) ruled that German courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate under Section 32 of the German Code of Civil Procedure in an action brought against Google Inc., a company seated in California, USA, for the infringement of… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:29 am by Steven Koprince
The second-lowest bidder, Welch Construction Inc., filed a protest challenging AmBuild’s SDVOSB status. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
In the case of `nonfeasance,’ a plaintiff must allege facts to indicate (a) that the defendant voluntarily undertook to render services necessary for the protection of another person or took charge of another person's protection; (b) that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care in that it wholly failed to perform the undertaking; and (c) that harm was suffered because of the other person's reliance on the defendant's undertaking. . .… [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
* Tripp Trapp and the Third Dimension: a study in trade mark registrability Here’s the much awaited IPKat comment on  Case C‑205/13 Hauck GmbH & Co. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Monday 27 October the Court will hear the matter of Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs to decide whether the appellant’s liability to UK income tax in relation to his membership of a Delaware limited liability company is to be computed by reference to the same profits or income by reference to which the appellant’s US tax liability is computed. [read post]