Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 4001 - 4020 of 16,701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Murphy’s article Abandon Chevron and Modernize Stare Decisis for the Administrative State is cited in the following article: Heather Elliott, Gorsuch v. the Administrative State, 70 ALA. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:21 am by Sahithya Muralidharan
It would be interesting to see if the plaintiff appeals this decision before the Supreme Court of India. *********** [1] Tea Board, India v ITC Limited, (C.S. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  And the survey expert admitted during cross-examination that consumers in different states might have different views on what “local” means. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:54 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
An exception was made for pit bulls when the Maryland Court of Appeals considered a pit bull attack in the 2012 case of Tracey v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:22 am by Jon L. Gelman
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970) (describing cross-examination as “the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth” (quoting 5 Wigmore on Evidence § 1367 (3d ed. 1940))); State v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They stated that they understood and were satisfied with the settlement and with their attorneys’ representation. [read post]
6 May 2019, 1:32 pm by Giles Peaker
The first to third defendants appealed, and the claimant cross-appealed on the dismissal of the claim against the freeholder. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:21 am by Eric Goldman
Backpage * District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’– Doe 1 v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
3 May 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The meaning of the article Although the article did not directly or literally state that Dr Chau bribed Mr Ashe, or that he participated in any conspiracy to do so. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]