Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
Farmland Protection Alliance v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:52 am
Key Takeaways for Local Public Agencies The census delay, SB 970, and emergency writ petition in Legislature of the State of California v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 11:18 am
As for the second part of this motion, the plaintiff seeks to amend the various statement of claims to: (a) add a claim that the plaintiff owns copyright in all of the articles; (b) add a new cause of action of the circumvention of a technological protection measure ("TPM") under section 41.1of the Copyright Act; ( c) add a claim that the defendant's activities were for a commercial purpose; (d) expand the claim to cover all articles that were available on… [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:59 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
I. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
Moderator: Joshua C. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
Cybersecurity Law – Law Without Rules “The code is more what you'd call 'guidelines' than actual rules. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Here's the language of that new paragraph, which took effect today: (2)(i) Notwithstanding paragraph one of this subdivision, for claims that would otherwise be subject to the provisions of paragraph one the provisions of this paragraph shall instead apply, with respect to any claim occurring from October 26, 2012 through November 15, 2012 in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk or Westchester, including their adjacent waters,… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Here's the language of that new paragraph, which took effect today: (2)(i) Notwithstanding paragraph one of this subdivision, for claims that would otherwise be subject to the provisions of paragraph one the provisions of this paragraph shall instead apply, with respect to any claim occurring from October 26, 2012 through November 15, 2012 in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk or Westchester, including their adjacent… [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
I’m then joined by my colleague Professor Jeremy DeBeer to discuss the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision on Keatley Surveying v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:47 am
Cain v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 12:35 pm
At any time after an elevation, the Main Street SPV may assign, grant a participation in, or otherwise transfer all or any portion of its rights in the Main Street loan without the consent of the Eligible Lender, but subject to the requirements of the Co-Lender Agreement (for bilateral facilities) or the assignment provisions of the underlying loan documents (for multi-lender facilities), as applicable. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 12:35 pm
At any time after an elevation, the Main Street SPV may assign, grant a participation in, or otherwise transfer all or any portion of its rights in the Main Street loan without the consent of the Eligible Lender, but subject to the requirements of the Co-Lender Agreement (for bilateral facilities) or the assignment provisions of the underlying loan documents (for multi-lender facilities), as applicable. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:00 pm
At any time after an elevation, the Main Street SPV may assign, grant a participation in, or otherwise transfer all or any portion of its rights in the Main Street loan without the consent of the Eligible Lender, but subject to the requirements of the Co-Lender Agreement (for bilateral facilities) or the assignment provisions of the underlying loan documents (for multi-lender facilities), as applicable. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Mexico has just adopted a terrible new copyright law, thanks to pressure from the United States (and specifically from the copyright maximalists that hold outsized influence on US foreign policy). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
W and B v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:58 pm
It allows job applicants and employees of federal contractors and subcontractors to file a discrimination complaint with OFCCP if they believe that their employer fired or otherwise discriminated against them for discussing, inquiring about, or disclosing their own compensation or that of others. [read post]
