Search for: "DANIELS v. STATE" Results 4001 - 4020 of 5,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
One individual petitioner (Daniel Berninger) and two groups of intervenors below [Disclosure: both represented by Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities] argue that the challenges are not moot. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am by Danielle Anz
As Daniel Carpenter-Gold writes, that decision has implications for state and local efforts to protect residents and reduce greenhouse-gas emission. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
To conclude, Passman stated that the decision to choose a trust ultimately comes down to the artist’s goals. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
We are not imagining what obstacles lie ahead if we were to “codify Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:29 am
On October 27, Deborah Giannecchini was awarded over $70 million in compensatory and punitive damage by a Missouri jury following three-hour deliberations (Deborah Giannecchini v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
“Frankly, I can't give any explanation for why the authors have been so dilatory,” Daniel Boorstin, Librarian of Congress, told the New York Times in 1983. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
The cases of Painer and Daniel Morel come to mind. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:25 pm by Amy Howe
For lawyers and lay people who generally don’t immerse themselves in the interstices of bankruptcy law, the most interesting part of today’s oral argument in Husky International Electronics v. [read post]