Search for: "Does v. United States of America" Results 4001 - 4020 of 4,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 2:25 am by gmlevine
Under the terms of the “.us” TLD, a foreign entity or organization must “certify” that it has a “bona fide presence in the United States” on the basis of “real and substantial lawful connections with, or lawful activities in, the United States of America. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
For example, 24 (or 12.7%) of the 2009 securities lawsuit filings involved companies that are domiciled outside the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm by zshapiro
The Supreme Court held in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project that one can be convicted of a crime for violating 18 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:18 am
: Don Henley et al v Charles DeVore etc al (IP Whiteboard) TheFlyOnTheWall.com - Google and Twitter pour cold water on ‘hot news’: Barclays v TheFlyOnTheWall.com (Ars Technica) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) US Copyright Group - P2P lawyers tell judge: suing 5,000 ‘Does’ at once is fine (ArsTechnica)   US Trademarks & Domain Names Online keyword advertising: Misleading customers? [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:59 pm by Duncan
: Don Henley et al v Charles DeVore etc al (IP Whiteboard) TheFlyOnTheWall.com – Google and Twitter pour cold water on ‘hot news’: Barclays v TheFlyOnTheWall.com (Ars Technica) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) US Copyright Group – P2P lawyers tell judge: suing 5,000 ‘Does’ at once is fine (ArsTechnica) US Trademarks & Domain Names Online keyword advertising: Misleading customers? [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
” The case is Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:35 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The court held that because any discretion on the part of the City of San Diego (“city”) was limited to aesthetics only, there was no discretionary action triggering supplemental environmental review of climate change impacts.In 1990, the city entered into a development agreement with the United States of America regarding a redevelopment project in downtown San Diego for which an environmental impact report (“EIR”) was certified. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm by Roberto M. Suárez
The legal, business, and scientific communities eagerly await the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP tango)   Switzerland Further step to Swiss Federal Patent Court (EPLAW)   United Kingdom Reminder: an appeal is not a re-hearing: Nampak Cartons Ltd v Rapid Action Packaging Ltd (PatLit) Stretching copyright with contract: Global Coal Ltd v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Barney, 129 U.S. 677, 682 (1889), and maintained in United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. [read post]