Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
” At the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief, as well as the issues at stake more broadly, in next Term’s North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:45 pm
United States ended its run today. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:36 pm
Chapter V explores sports issues in private litigation, including standing, class actions, injunctions, and damages. [read post]
28 May 2014, 7:41 am
In Petrella v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Morland-Jones v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:37 pm
In the 2002 case of Atkins v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:48 am
” State v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
25 May 2014, 4:04 am
It is not possible or desirable to provide any sort of exhaustive list, but the following examples illustrate the breadth of the concept: (1) A procedural irregularity or manifest unfairness which causes the decision of a Tribunal to be unjust. (2) A decision based on a finding of fact for which there is no supporting evidence (British Telecom v Sheridan [1990]… [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am
The first guerrilla organizers were dissident army officers, appalled by their country’s subservience to U.S. interests, and then university intellectuals, shut out of electoral politics by state repression of the left. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:10 am
[Oleg] Ostapenko and to say that, indeed, we will proceed from the fact that we can no longer deliver these engines to the United States, and that we can no longer maintain and repair previously shipped engines, unless we receive guarantees that our engines are used only for launching civilian payloads,” Rogozin said in the official English-language transcript. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:40 pm
Accordingly, in McQuillan v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
It stated, insofar as is relevant here,`1. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:36 pm
Procaps S.A. v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
” Méndez v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:28 am
In Bullard v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:53 pm
The actions of the defendant will only constitute a refusal only if he was warned against it as stated in White v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:55 pm
” Here’s how the Court got there in plain English: its just like the Viagra example above. [read post]
