Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 9,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2010, 8:38 pm
Teleprompter Mannattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1983) (Slip op. at ¶ 12), but not even mentioning First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am
Following the decision of the House of Lords, in Macmillan Inc v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
Let us know in our poll: Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.The Garner Transcripts: That v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm
Nevertheless, as the briefs in Smith v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 10:50 am
In Islam v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:03 pm
ZERO MEAT v MEAT ZERO Background On 29 September 2021, CPF Food and Beverage Co., Ltd. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See, Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
Had the remaining four defendants also been in breach of English trade mark law as joint tortfeasors? [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:38 am
The Guidelines were later revised (v. 2009). [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 12:06 am
& another v S.A. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:40 am
But NLRB v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
[v] Both Canada[vi] and New Zealand[vii] quickly claimed victory. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:43 pm
Ferguson and Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be argued that… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be argued that… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:38 pm
In Visa International Service Association v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:39 am
Anyway, the case is Football Dataco Limited & Others v Sportradar GMBH and Sportradar AG [2012] EWHC 1185 (Ch). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:36 pm
The Bench relied on the decision rendered by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Brownlie v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
And their English forebears were at odds over that issue even before the reign of Charles II in the middle 1600s. [read post]
