Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 44,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
V. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:16 am
Loomer sued in state court. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
So far, they have done a pretty good job. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Whether Gentry remains good law or not may be gleaned from this opinion but it doesn’t appear likely it will be clearly stated. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
The Board affirmed the same standard in this reconsideration, stating "[t]he goods must belong to the trademark owner" (quoted above). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:15 am
Good luck. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
In a new case, known as United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 12:32 am
Excellent thoughts (from a non-patent practitioner) regarding his frustrations with the patent bar vs “trademark bar” system we have: Patent Bar v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:32 am
The dissenters point out that 14 (now 15) state courts have addressed whether to use the best interests of the child analysis: Most states that have confronted the issue we face today have held that a “best interests” consideration is inappropriate under the “good cause” analysis in Section 1911(b). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:45 am
" So it's possible this case may be decided in favor of the state without causing too much damage. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:24 am
Hence, it would do good to merge Clauses 3A and 4. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:07 am
Most obviously, the contract may expressly state whether it is a contract for goods or services. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
I got this case confused with Terry v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
(Gade v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 2:52 am
US v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
" He likens it (if I understand his argument) to Justice Harlan's tradition-based methodology of due process in Poe v. [read post]
