Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 44,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
(See McCollum v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:11 am
Supreme Court’s decision last year in Young v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
Superior Court (42 Cal. 4th 443 (2007)) remains good law until a higher court rules otherwise. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
Meanwhile, Shareholders argued that the court should apply an exception to the rule developed by the Court of Appeals in Boland v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:00 am
In The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:15 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:48 pm
., v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 12:42 pm
Holt (Tribal Search Warrant; Probable Cause; Good Faith Exception) Narragansett Indian Tribe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
The Board affirmed the same standard in this reconsideration, stating "[t]he goods must belong to the trademark owner" (quoted above). [read post]
10 May 2018, 11:11 am
We believe the final episode in this saga should be good news for employers. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:10 am
Backpage and Herrick v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
Law Lessons from SPCP GROUP, L.L.C. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:57 pm
The February 10, 2021, Court of Appeals opinion in Daily v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Kilgore v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 2:00 pm
Good friends. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
This case might make a good student law review article.Defendant exercises his right to represent himself at his first criminal trial and makes various statements during closing argument that, let's say, are less than well-advised (e.g., are incriminating). [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 12:32 am
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Whether Gentry remains good law or not may be gleaned from this opinion but it doesn’t appear likely it will be clearly stated. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers. [read post]
