Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 5,731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 3:45 am
He argues that the convictions should have merged as allied offenses, but the 12th District says it’s too late for that claim; it could and should have been raised on appeal from the original sentence… Bad decision from the 6th District in State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
Holder and Hardy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:23 am
In Judulang v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:19 am
The seminal case of Lamont v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:35 am
The copyright holder can control the “first sale,” but that’s it. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
In Judulang v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:00 am
Young's decision in Culhane v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
We should put burden of proof on data holders: prove you can’t provide same services with less data, or be quiet. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Monday in Judulang v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
He characterizes it as “[a] case that could redefine when free speech becomes criminal behavior toward public officials. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
In Stein v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 5:05 am
Although it is important to stop rights holders from bullying third parties, these protections have become problematic. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:36 am
Stevens and Eldred v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:19 pm
The Supreme Court summed up how the severability doctrine is to work in a 1992 decision, New York v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:58 pm
So he's had seven additional years in the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:56 am
From the new Third Circuit Order in Pieschacon-Villegas v Holder, December 5, 2011. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:18 pm
Well, let's examine a case that will serve as a good illustration of these two charges: People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314It is a basic principle of land registration, reinforced by the Land Registration Act 2002, that the holder of an adverse interest to a title should protect that interest by entering a notice on the register (unless they are unable to do so, for example because their interest is excluded). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314It is a basic principle of land registration, reinforced by the Land Registration Act 2002, that the holder of an adverse interest to a title should protect that interest by entering a notice on the register (unless they are unable to do so, for example because their interest is excluded). [read post]
