Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2015, 8:16 am
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am
In Zemmour v France [2022] ECHR 1130 (in French only), the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that the Article 10 right of the applicant, a journalist and political commentator, had not been violated by his conviction for inciting discrimination and religious hatred against the Muslim community in France under s.24 § 7 of the Freedom of the Press Act of 29 July 1881. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 11:12 am
McMullin, held that the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation as set forth in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:05 pm
On Wednesday, March 31, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Padilla v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
And if it is so held that the law requires the Secretary of State to make a determination about the fairness of the Egyptian proceedings, that will undoubtedly make for some uncomfortable discussions at the Home Office. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:30 am
Mireles v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
The opinion also creates a split in authority on whether representative PAGA actions remain inarbitrable post-Concepcion, as held in Brown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:50 pm
” Lewis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:08 am
Cavender The federal courts have recently decided two significant Clean Water Act (CWA) cases: State of Georgia, et al. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:50 am
Then came CML V, LLC in which the Delaware Supreme Court held: 1. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 7:09 pm
Clarke v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:00 am
The judiciary, right from the famous case of Virsa Singh v State of Punjab 1958 AIR 465 has relied literally on the medical reports to adjudicate the actus reus of the accused and this reliance has been time and again criticized. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:02 am
The judiciary, right from the famous case of Virsa Singh v State of Punjab 1958 AIR 465 has relied literally on the medical reports to adjudicate the actus reus of the accused and this reliance has been time and again criticized. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 3:39 pm
We are happy to report that the Department of State has released an important announcement that describes the agency’s compliance with the recent court ruling, Gomez v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:41 am
In a 5-2 decision in State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:31 am
Citizens with criminal convictions, the United States Supreme Court recently held in Chaidez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:55 am
On Tuesday in McGuinness v New York State Workers' Compensation Bd., 2007 NY Slip Op 05236, the Second Department held that the Court of Claims lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review determinations of the State Worker's Compensation Board. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:12 pm
Last Thursday, In AP Optronics v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:31 pm
Shawn Minihan won in State v. [read post]
