Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 4,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
It is time for the United States to do just that - to grant the Uighurs asylum within U.S. borders. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:06 pm
Holder, No. 01-cv-01854 (D. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
” [17] The enforcement unit of the Fina [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Washington State Patent Law Blog) US Patents US Commerce Secretary Locke on patents (Intellectual Property Watch) Innovation with lead recovery if patent system allows (IP Watchdog) ‘Judicial Business of the United States Courts’ report – only 3.8% of all patent cases reach court stage (Innovationpartners) Did you know... existing English language translations of documents must be produces during discovery at the ITC? [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
An award is allowed only where the court finds that ‘the position of the United States was vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 12:38 pm
How about the one where he analogizes the conduct here to Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union: "See United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
Now up here on the official DOJ website is the "Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder Regarding United States V. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
Now up here on the official DOJ website is the "Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder Regarding United States V. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:03 am
See Warner v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
â€5 The site’s “Facebook Principles†state that a user may “set up a personal profile, form relationships, perform searches and queries, form groups, set up events, add applications and transmit information through various channels. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:28 pm
Will government of the people, by the people and for the people perish from the United States? [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
It states that Congress found the following: (i) the Treasury Secretary does not have authority to provide exemptions or special rules to particular industries or classes of taxpayers; (ii) the Notice granting 382 relief is inconsistent with Congressional intent and the legal authority of this Notice is doubtful; but (iii) taxpayers should be allowed to rely on the Notice. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
The Rodriguez saga starts with two first generation immigrants to the United States, Rafael Rodriguez and Joaquin Estevez, who became successful retail business owners in New York City. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 3:31 am
“Whether he wants to or not, Secretary Gates can effect a release in the United States….Because there is no dispute about this, and no compliance is forthcoming, a finding of contempt is now warranted. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
A juror in the States (all fools anyway?) [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 10:36 am
United States, 334 U.S. 742, 767 n.9 (1948) (citation omitted), as well as the Supreme Court’s directive in Boumediene that “[i]n considering both the procedural and substantive standards used to impose detention to prevent acts of terrorism, proper deference must be accorded to the political branches,” 128 S.Ct. at 2276 (2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
United States Issue: Whether Harris v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:05 pm
In December, without any independent evidence that the men had engaged in hostilities against the United States, U.S. officials sent them to Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:39 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today (Tong v. [read post]
