Search for: "House of Congress Employment" Results 4001 - 4020 of 5,072
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2010, 4:23 pm
So where does that leave us with President Obama's big meeting yesterday with the House (Anti)Trade Working Group (instead of, you know, the powerful House and Senate committee chairmen who are griping about beef and autos)? [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:23 am by Jon
  Additionally, the federal government should refrain from imposing unjustified conditions and federal requirements that should be decided by state legislatures, rather than the United State Congress. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:45 am by Jon Hyman
The Democrats swept into office in January 2009 with promises of paradigm-shifting labor and employment law reforms: card check union recognition, Title VII coverage for sexual orientation and gender identity, expanded FMLA coverage, the end of arbitration agreements, and paid sick leave are but a few of the campaign issues on which the Democrats won the the White House and substantial majorities in both halves of Congress. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
One Congress cannot bind a future Congress. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:47 am
  After the seismic shift in Congress, if any immigration legislation comes out of the House, it will likely be an enforcement-only bill. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:40 am by justia
The Iowa Legislature passed a law this spring that requires all employers to give veterans a legal day off on Veterans Day. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:40 am by justia
The Iowa Legislature passed a law this spring that requires all employers to give veterans a legal day off on Veterans Day. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 3:43 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Nor does it address children of soldiers stationed overseas, for whom there is no state structure to pass the buck to.Reduce Congressional & White House budgets by 15%$.8 BThis is more illustrative than meaningful; Congressional offices are generally pretty cramped and only a few staffers make real money anyway. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:04 pm by LindaMBeale
  It is hard to see how, in conscience, Congress can avoid enacting a carried interest provision that will undo that unfair advantage. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:55 am by admin
For example, they could limit funds and personnel available to the Internal Revenue Service to block it from enforcing tax penalties on individuals and employers. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:40 am
IMPACT OF THE ELECTION ON HEALTHCARE REFORM:The November 2 midterm congressional elections resulted in a change in leadership in the House of Representatives, where Republicans are poised to take control of the chamber when the 112th Congress convenes in early January 2011.In the days immediately following the election, Speaker-in-waiting John Boehner (R-OH) has made clear that House Republicans intend to pursue a strategy to roll back key pieces of the new healthcare law… [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:32 pm by Lisa McElroy
  Should the employer be held liable? [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 5:15 pm by Gary Becker
In addition, the American system should be weaned from being mainly tax-deductible employer based health insurance to a more desirable system, where individuals and families can buy insurance in other ways on the same after tax terms as from employers. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 5:55 am by Jon Hyman
State Secret Ballot Measures – from Workplace Prof Blog Post-elections Implications for Labor Bills in Congress – from Joe’s HR and Benefits Blog Impact of Midterm Election on Employment Law – from The Word on Employment Law with John Phillips Ohio: More Business-Friendly Approach Is Likely – from HR Hero’s Human Resources News Now That the Election is Done and Republicans Own the… [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:49 am by Gordon Smith
" What does all of this have to do with the 112th Congress? [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:33 am by HR Hero Alerts
As a result of the shift in power in the House, it will be highly unlikely that Congress will pass any new employment-related initiatives. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:11 pm by WIMS
He said, "No significant regulation should take effect until Congress has voted to approve it and the president has had an opportunity to approve or veto congressional action. [read post]