Search for: "IN RE: ENGLAND"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 4,905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 12:55 am
They’ve now bounced back, but they’re still more than 25 per cent below historic averages”. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:24 pm
Terry (Castleton State College and University Press of New England 2011). [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:32 am
He ultimately withdrew that application in July 2014 but quickly re-entered the process in September of that same year. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:45 pm
It is notable that although the Judge convicted the agent for breaches of the Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation (England) Regulations 2006, absolute discharges were given for these offences (although fines were imposed for the failure to licence). [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
Canadian law societies, unlike the regulators in Australia and England, are independent of the state. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:31 am
Well, the Minster is closed right now because they’re consecrating a couple of new bishops, but it reopens in a few minutes, so I’ll run over there and see if I can get any further comment. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 4:35 am
If you want one for the UK, or more likely just for England and Wales, Curzon, or Mozley and Whitely, or Osborn, or the Oxford Dictionary of Law (the latter has fewer and longer entries) are all OK. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:41 am
The SPC Blog's informants -- Richard Ebbink and Mark van Gardingen, Brinkhof -- mentioned that the court's decision contained many references in the decision to the 4 May 2007 decision of Mr Justice Kitchin of the Patents Court for England and Wales [noted here by the IPKat], with which decision the Dutch Court "respectfully disagreed".The IPKat has since heard from Jaap J.E. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 4:45 am
By focusing so narrowly on the facts of the case, the reply from the Court of Justice to the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) emphasised the grounds on which it was appropriate to refuse registration of a mark having those characteristics, but it scarcely set out for undertakings the guidelines for registering functional signs as trade marks. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:34 pm
Such devices are one of the many ways we can draw parallels between modern-day Woodstock, Vermont and Victorian England...But I digress. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 11:00 pm
Hacking by hacks Elsewhere in the media world, the re-ignition of the Andy Coulson phone-hacking affair is reminiscent of a fish eating its own tail. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 10:16 am
… they’re all on the make… dodgy expenses, nannies who can’t type doubling as secretaries…. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:00 pm
And the same raft of JR claims that followed the bedroom tax/benefit cap will now be re-fought on the HB restrictions. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
” (Note, however, that if you want to sell your self-published CD or DVD, you’re subject to the law. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:12 am
64 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 11 from 2012: Childhood under siege : how big business callously targets children Joel Bakan. [read post]
29 May 2011, 1:15 pm
A neurosis, as Ken Tynan wisely observed, is a secret that you don’t know you’re keeping. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
[The IPKat thinks this is a really interesting question, despite its irrelevance in this particular situation, and suspects that it will re-emerge in the future when issues like secondary liability and exemption from liability for service providers crop up]. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 5:56 am
If you’re doing the math, that works out to 200,000,000,000 drinks per year (or 800,000,000,000 over four years). [read post]
25 May 2009, 8:31 am
So, as in all other aspects of the modern administrative state, we're really talking about the ability of the President to "delegate" such decision-making authority to a small group of men and women who will know, presumably, that they won't have to defend their decisions before anything that might be described as a traditional Article III court applying traditional legal standards.2. [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:44 am
Di Re, 332 U.S. 581, 594 (1948) (“One has an undoubted right to resist an unlawful arrest, and courts will uphold the right of resistance in proper cases. [read post]
