Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 4001 - 4020
of 42,088
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2022, 3:09 am
That Question 6 is asked does not mean that a positive response precludes approval by C&F. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 1:01 am
Lincoln scholar Ronald C. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm
§501(c)(3) Organizations Is a Trap for the Unwary in Certain States was highlighted in the following publication: Nancy Shurtz, Estate Planning, 49 Est. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
” She thus concludes that “[p]laintiff has an interest in and need for at least a portion of it. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 10:31 am
It would expand the exclusion from gross income for qualified charitable distributions from an IRA to certain distributions to a split-interest entity (charitable remainder trusts, charitable gift annuities). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on September 6, 2022. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Irby Chair and Rutledge C. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:46 pm
The plaintiff ultimately underwent a c-section. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:50 pm
Today 4/3 publishes an interesting and important dismissal case here:Respondents move to dismiss this appeal as untimely. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
§ 212.1(c)(1)(i). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 3:22 am
§ 1125(c)(3)(C), thus barring as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act.Jack Daniel's argues that the petition should be granted because (1) the Courts of Appeals are divided on the Questions Presented, (2) the Questions Presented Are recurring, important, and squarely presented, and (3) the decision below is egregiously wrong. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:24 am
"2.2 Novelty in view of D5 (Article 54(3) EPC)2.2.1 The appellant submitted that, as already acknowledged by the examining division in the appealed decision, document D5 did not disclose the features of the characterising portion of claim 1 as amended, namely the ones of former claims 4 and 5 as well as former claims 17 and 18, i.e. features (c) and (d).2.2.2 The appealed decision contained novelty objections under Article 54(3) EPC with respect to indep [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 7:22 pm
If you are interested in learning more about this topic, please visit the Privacy and Data Security practice area of our website. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:12 pm
But it also suggests that preserving confidentiality is key, and that interested persons need to get notice and a chance to object when public disclosure is contemplated. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 7:51 am
(c).) [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:13 am
§ 109(a) and (c). [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm
As we explained in our letter, starting in 1933 and 1934, the federal securities laws established the SEC as the primary regulator of the capital markets, and, in so doing, Congress expressly stated that capital market regulation was essential, not just for investor protection, but to serve the broader interests of the U.S. economy. [read post]
