Search for: "In Re: White v."
Results 4001 - 4020
of 4,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
Not what we're used to in these situations. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
White, No. 07-2404 Defendant's drug conviction is affirmed, where Defendant lacked notice of the government's intent to introduce "tools of the trade" expert testimony, but that evidence did not prejudice him. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:27 am
About $465 (but remember, much higher consumable costs, likely around 25 cents per page v. about 2 cents per page for the black and white unit above). [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
I went to Utah at my own expense and took no fees to train Shurtleff's staff on combating white collar crime. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
., v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Apr 8, 2009)(Unpub)Pro Se teacher manages to flip dismissal of her TVII race/HWE/retal claims where district court, on remand, must re-evaluate whether to enforce settlement agreement; dismissal of ADEA claim affirmed Utley v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
Currently, Texans don't have to identify themselves unless they're actually arrested, and it's not a crime if you don't do so. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:05 am
We're all aware of City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
In this White Paper, we provide an overview of current exposures facing companies involved in subprime-related businesses, as well as early trends in subprime-related securities litigation, from the vantage point of lawyers who are at the front lines of the current conflict. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:51 am
" See Autery blog here.If you're attacking a harsh sentence on appeal, however, check out the recent decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Austinuts, Oppositions Nos. 91166551 and 91166552 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the marks AUSTINUTS in standard character and design form, for nuts, in view of the mark AUSTIN, in standard character and design form, for crackers and cookies, including crackers with peanut butter].April 30, 2009 - 11 AM: In re Interactive Media Communications, Serial No. 76668415 [Appeal from requirement for disclaimer of the term "strippersociety.com" in the mark shown below [but in… [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:30 pm
Supporters note the momentum they gained March 4 when the Supreme Court, in Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:48 am
Supporters note the momentum they gained March 4 when the Supreme Court, in Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:59 am
Green Mountain Chrysler v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:26 pm
- Pittsburgh lawyer David Wagner of Reed Smith on the firm's Environmental Law Resource Estate of Jorgensen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 12:17 pm
White v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
If a corporate dissolution contest could be re-imagined as a TV game show, I'd call the case of Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
[See, See R. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
White Laboratories, Inc., 847 F.2d 355, 357-58 (7th Cir. 1988); McMahon v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
" Haven't they heard of United States v. [read post]
