Search for: "In re F. E."
Results 4001 - 4020
of 7,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2013, 6:06 am
In In re Chastagner, Ch. 7 Case No. 12-11488, 2013 Bankr. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
Coincidimos con la Comisión en que “[e]s inconcebible que un juez que consume drogas y maltrata física y psicológicamente a su pareja, se dedique a juzgar y tomar decisiones en la vida de otros ciudadanos”. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:27 am
Mexicans (lower education level, some may be undocumented); e. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:27 am
The jury found for FLIR, but also found that FLIR falsely advertised its E-series cameras’ ability to pass a two-meter drop test. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:37 pm
(E) is no better. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:37 pm
(E) is no better. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 5:51 am
In In re Piazza, 719, F.3d 1253, 2013 U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:17 am
Natural Res. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:19 pm
Alverez, 697 F.3d 41 (2nd Cir.2012) which set forth three reasons why equitable tolling is not applicable. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:46 am
In Re Koc, 181 F.Supp.2d at 152;accord Lozano, 697 F.3d at 57; Matovski, 2007 WL 2600862, at *13; Reyes Olguin v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
Mota, 692 F.3d at 116 , quoting Gitter, 396 F.3d at 134. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:02 pm
Com efeito, não se pode, em detrimento da justiça, fazer prevalecer a fórmula, nem sempre aplicável, de que “o Judiciário não pode se substituir &agrav [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm
Citigroup Inc., 827 F. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 2:50 am
The Board noted that even if the applied-for design is more expensive or more difficult to make, that does not mean it is not de jure functional.The Board concluded that the overall design of applicant's pipe boot is dictated by utilitarian concerns and is therefore unregistrable under Section 2(e)(5).Acquired Distinctiveness: For the sake of completeness, the Board considered opposer's claim that, even if the applied-for design were not barred by Section 2(e)(5), it lacked the… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 10:01 pm
“I think we’re really missing an opportunity to avoid cases of food poisoning like mine,” she said. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
Cir. 1999) (second alteration in original) (quoting In re Barr Labs., Inc., 930 F.2d 72, 74 (D.C.Cir. 1991)). [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
I think such closed-mindedness is unfortunate and counterproductive, and if we don’t stop to understand what others are saying—even when we don’t like it—we’re doomed forever to talk past each other. [read post]
Federal Circuit: Preliminary Injunctions More Available in Trade Secret Cases (Than in Patent Cases)
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
From what I have been able to learn I believe you have been in a law suit with my company, and I am not very happy with trying to re-create someone else's work. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 11:25 am
Responses from those that did spanned the yes-no-maybe gamut: "We’re not publicly commenting on the subpoenas or whether we received one," Jason Lukasiewicz, the CEO of Coinsetter, told Ars by e-mail. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:44 am
Ultimately, District Judge Kimba Wood, denied E&Y’s motion because the class action waiver provision was not enforceable under the Second Circuit’s 2009 decision in In re American Express Merchant’s Litigation (“AMEX I”). [read post]
