Search for: "John Doe D" Results 4001 - 4020 of 9,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 8:11 am by Elina Saxena
So, Secretary Clinton, I'd like to start with you. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
You can reach John at John@slgattorneys.com Follow John on Twitter: https://twitter.com/JohnGihon Follow my blog: http://www.floridaimmigrationlawyerblog.com [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:13 am by Old Fox
That said, I’ve always thought he’d be a deeply, deeply, flawed nominee. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:35 am by Jim Sedor
” Only two others earned better than a “D+”; 11 states received failing grades. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:13 pm by Jeff Richardson
This tablet does things your phone and your laptop can’t do. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:01 am by familoo
So, what does the scheme involve? [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  The second, more permissive, definition eschews actual awareness, but still demands a “high degree” of risk: “(2) where the ‘actor has such knowledge, or reason to know, of the facts, but does not realize or appreciate the high degree of risk involved, although a reasonable man in his position would do so. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
He further alleges that Adobe actually identified him and `attribute[d] his viewing choices to his profile’ using the information disclosed by Disney. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm by Brian Matt
Dick Gephardt’s (D-MO 3rd) in 1988, Rep. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
John Elwood (briefly) reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:38 am
" In sum, the marks are dissimilar as to appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.Petitioner argued that its NAUTICA marks are famous, but the Board observed that even it assumed fame for Section 2(d) purposes, that does not prove likelihood of confusion. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:32 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Sixth Circuit ruled yesterday that the federal Clean Air Act does not preempt state common law claims. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am by Evan Lee
“You know we give them a ‘D’ for their drafting of this statute. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 2:54 am
" As usual, the Board found beer and wine related for Section 2(d) purposes, but what about the marks? [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
The BBC has said it did not resist the police seizure of reporter Secunder Kermani’s laptop because the Terrorism Act 2000 does not allow it to mount a freedom of speech defence. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm by David Cheifetz
The judicial pecking order does not permit little peckers to overrule big peckers. [read post]