Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 4001 - 4020
of 120,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday’s disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us – People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 11:55 am
Rarely do I read a case in which I think that the defendant may well be actually innocent. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:17 pm
My post may be a bit late in the day, but to me this case is also a few years late. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Blueford v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
What is clear is that emerging reproductive technologies require us to consider the legal framework in a fresh and contemporary way, and to adapt it to accommodate challenges that these technologies may present. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:31 am
A US Patent Application that is finally rejected by a patent examiner may be appealed to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“BPAI”). [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.Source: Article-“Employees Terminated for Medical Marijuana Use May Sue: Court. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:59 pm
" United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:08 pm
The case, US v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
On Monday we will resume with a discussion of the recent decision arisng out of the Enron collapse, Regents v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
Per Lewis v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 6:28 am
Not the science used, but how the evidence is handled.Lawyers who work with scientific evidence - used in criminal investigations, products liabiality, medical malpractice, etc. - need to be aware of these issues.It seems that the forensic science shown on televison may be more fantasy than we thought.Ernster, the Virtual Library Cat [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:07 pm
Marin and Alameda leave us with somewhat conflicting legal frameworks for analyzing if, when, and under what circumstances a public employer or the legislature may modify the pension benefits of public employees after they have begun employment. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in Torres v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 1:05 pm
In contrast, descriptive terms, which may be protectable, describe a “function, use, characteristic, size, or intended purpose of the product,” such as 5 MINUTE GLUE or KING SIZE MEN’S CLOTHING. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:00 pm
(see Buck v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court handed down an opinion in United States v. [read post]
