Search for: "Matter of Kennedy" Results 4001 - 4020 of 4,836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2009, 6:05 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Adherence to the plain meaning rule is not simply a matter of judicial craftsmanship. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
And this is true no matter how much better the plea deal is than the near-certain outcome of a trial.Why, though, do I mention the right to have a trial rather than plead guilty? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  The Court stated as follows: “In order to assess the validity of [DOMA’s rejection of same-sex marriage as marriage for federal purposes] it is necessary to discuss the extent of the state power and authority over marriage as a matter of history and tradition. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am by Kali Borkoski
”   But “[o]n the other hand,” he continued, “would they know that this is two-percent of the matter, what they’re seeing, and would they, in fact, understand that most of what we do does not involve the two people in front of us, the lawyers on either side? [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” becomes, no matter how narrow the win, an excuse to set legislative rules that treat the opposition party’s voters as if they did not exist.But what are the limits on such non-gerrymandered power plays? [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm by Barry Winograd
Dobson.Justice Kennedy reasoned that the use of different modifiers for “commerce” supported reliance on the canon of ejusdem generis. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 6:24 am by Amy Howe
Kennedy, Jr., which argued that former Fox News host Tucker Carlson had been fired for “acknowledging that the TV networks pushed a deadly and ineffective vaccine to please their Pharma advertisers. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The deference to the marriages of sister states has been granted as a matter of comity, or respect, rather than being due to a constitutional mandate of full faith and credit. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
Stanford student Samantha Bateman discusses oral argument in Yeager v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
Section 36(b), added to the Act in 1970 in response to perceived abuses in the fee arrangements between funds and advisors, is somewhat puzzlingly worded -- so much so that Justices Breyer and Kennedy yesterday wondered aloud about the provision's import, while Justice Scalia predictably labeled the statutory language "utterly meaningless. [read post]