Search for: "P.C., Matter of" Results 4001 - 4020 of 6,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Discovery Radiology Physicians, P.C.; Allstate Insurance Company, The People ex rel. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
In 1977 Edmund Kitch said that the grant of a patent could also have the purpose of encouraging further research on the patented subject matter, giving an analogy to a mining claim of staking out an area for further research. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 8:09 pm
In a way it was always going to be over by November as Pennsylvania is electing a new Attorney General on November 8, 2016 no matter what had happened. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 6:43 am by Tate Law Offices, P.C.
Resolving post-trial matters – After a jury verdict is entered, either side may file motions or appeals with a higher court. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 12:25 pm
Sagaria Law, P.C. handles paternity disputes, paternity claims, child custody issues, and child support matters in Santa Clara County, Alameda County, and Monterey County. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 10:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Lehr, an attorney with Lehr Middlebrooks Vreeland & Thompson, P.C. in Birmingham, says. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Mallon P.C. has provided an overview of the NFA Self-Examination process. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 1:22 pm by Ronald Mann
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Kennedy, a pivotal vote whose future on the bench is a matter of intense speculation. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 5:43 pm
Sagaria Law, P.C. handles Chapter 7, 11, and 13 Bankruptcy cases as well as other bankruptcy and business formation-related matters in Monterey County, Alameda County, and Santa Clara County. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Doctors are supposed to represent patients, not credit card companies, no matter what kind of kickbacks they are offered. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm by WSLL
Brown of Darrah, Darrah & Brown, P.C., Powell, Wyoming. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
A Thanks:  All of the case briefs and argument documents are neatly packaged by Tom Goldstein and Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
At the Sentencing Law and Policy Blog, Douglas Berman observes that “about a quarter of the cases still on th[is term’s merits] docket involve criminal justice matters. [read post]