Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 5,283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 4:06 am
Here, a person most people — including the jurors who have spoken with the media — believe is likely guilty of murder is now walking free. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Maybe it's like when somebody introduces you to new people and tells them how funny you are. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:47 am
The IPKat's friends Marleen H.J. van den Horst and Jaap Bremer (BarentsKrans NV), who represented Stada in the Dutch proceedings, have kindly gone to the effort of rendering the District Court's decision into English and you can read it here. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:01 pm
Its test case litigation efforts have all failed - most notably CCH v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm
Karlseng v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:18 am
Supreme Court in Robins Dry Dock Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 6:13 pm
Coffin v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm
Romer v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:26 pm
In prior posts on this blog, including one discussing the fine opinion in People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
” According to Hernandez-Miranda v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Whereas the published paper was not considered to render the claimed inventions obvious, the Judge considered that:[411] “…there can be no serious dispute that Professor Smith’s talk made it obvious to try phage display of antibodies provided that there was a sufficient expectation of success having regard to the other factors considered above. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:08 am
In last week’s claim (Ryan v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:47 pm
At issue before the Court of Appeals recently was the question whether a defendant could - by sacrificing an illegally lenient sentence on a prior conviction - remove a predicate conviction by effectively moving his conviction date from before the current crime was comhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifmitted to after.The answer under the facts in this case was no (People v Acevedo, 2011 NY Slip Op 05582 [decided June 30, 2011]). [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
The ‘rule in Bonnard v Perryman‘ provides that injunctions are denied in libel if the defendant promises credibly to defend the case at trial. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 5:11 am
” Parloff notes that the most relevant precedent is one from twelve years ago in Texas, Unauthorized Practice of Law Comm. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:54 am
In Dukes, the Court de-certified a class of more than one million people. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:56 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
