Search for: "STATE v BUSH" Results 4001 - 4020 of 4,538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
  The Bush II  administration's  desire to be exempt from the FOIA  is made clear in its Motion for a Judgment on the Pleadings  (the  exhibits thereto are here, here, and here)  filed by the White House Office of Administration ("OAH")  against this FOIA Complaint of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ("CREW") in CREW v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 7:35 am
Judicial reactions, formal and informal, to Gall and Kimbrough The weighty guidelines question after Gall One (of many) tough questions after Gall and Kimbrough Is Kimbrough as big as Brown v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Family Voices Coordinators have met with their state legislators and with state ICC Council members many times this yea, and have sent Family Voices information to over 10,000 families in the state. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 11:48 pm
Bush, in which the Court considered whether detainees held in the United States military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have a constitutional right of access to federal courts to challenge their internment. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:48 am
Rigsby peeking its head up over the bushes, if the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 12:14 pm
The case of Macomber v Travelers was heard before the Connecticut Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 6:43 am
Part III concludes with two strategies that can help avoid the Article II question from becoming the next Bush v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 12:00 am
Bush's post-9/11 military commissions.... 1952 (55 years ago today), U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
Bush (2004), did not praise but did not overrule, either. [read post]