Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 4001 - 4020 of 4,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2007, 1:28 pm
The Court of Appeals remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the issue of distribution of the $2 million compensation package, stating: On remand, the trial court should bear in mind the portion of the property division to which the parties have not objected, although the remand is limited to the compensation package. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:06 pm
   By coincidence (one supposes), just five days before the Times article appeared, New Jersey's intermediate appellate court issued its opinion in State v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:30 am
State of Indiana (NFP) - Yes, I did a doubletake too! [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:50 am
Until the Court of Appeals rules on the issue, it may be best to simply flip a coin. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
One of the three defendants appealed.The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:34 am
If anyone else has ever seen such a thing from a state's highest court, I'd love to hear about it.The decision is reproduced in full below (Scott Greenfield, loved the caption, People v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:56 am
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, County Department, Law Division, No. 02 L 004839. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:15 am
The Court of Appeal so stated, inter alia, when: (i) allowing an appeal by the defendants, Nochum Halpern, David Halpern, Bezalel Halpern, Akiva Halpern and Eshter Vaisfische, against a decision of Mr Justice Christopher Clarke in the commercial court ([2006] 2 All ER (Comm) 251) and (ii) allowing their appeal against a decision of Mr Nigel Teare, QC, sitting as a deputy Queen's Bench Division judge ( The Times July 18,… [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
" Alimony: Payment of support from one party to another; may include property division and attorney fees. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:51 pm
Following graduation, Sprigman clerked for the Honorable Stephen Reinhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and for Justice Lourens H. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:18 am
I submit once again that no such legal standard exists.With a 3-2 division in the appellate court, the matter is ripe for appeal to New York's Court of Appeals.The case is Sims v. [read post]
6 May 2007, 7:30 pm
The big case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States this past week, at least for patent attorneys like the host of last week's Blawg Review #106, was KSR v Teleflex. [read post]
6 May 2007, 5:07 pm
On Thursday 10 May there's a hearing in Case C-311/05 P Naipes Heraclio Fournier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, a desperate appeal by the owner of the copyright in some illustrations on Spanish playing cards against the Court of First Instance's refusal to reverse the Board of Appeal's decision that those illustrations were wrongfully registered as Community trade marks for, er, playing cards.On the same day the Court of… [read post]