Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 12,938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2015, 8:15 am
Part VIII of the MCC was inserted following the judgment in Subramaniam Balaji v State of Tamil Nadu. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These state owned enterprises (SOEs) operate where state duty and enterprise responsibility meet. [read post]
7 May 2022, 6:15 am
Since the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
That aligns with the continued robustness of the core principles of globalization based on idea of a level playing field in which states have a duty to enhance value in the macro community, while economic enterprises have a micro obligation of value enhancement (mindful of business, legal, and financial risk) toward its community of investors or in some instances for the enhancement of its value as a going concern (discussed here). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:16 pm
See Sage Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:18 pm
In Cancer Voices et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 11:11 am
Akeva v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:33 pm
V. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
The Second Circuit decided Young v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 10:39 am
The State of Texas owns the land within Texas riverbeds. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:27 am
Gilles v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm
Leading scholars will offer brief reflections on the long history of black freedom movements, their significance to United States history more generally, and their relevance for today. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
As for the question of discrimination in field of technology:Aside from mandating the three requirements for patentable subject matter (new, inventive step, and capable of industrial application), Art 27.1 mandates that “…patents shall be available for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology… ” and “…without discrimination as to … the field of technology…”. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:23 am
See Abdullahi v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:41 am
In a significant decision, Karim v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:41 pm
So after leafing through the majority opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
(Jones v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:50 am
United States (1997) and New York v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:29 am
(See Cecil v. [read post]
