Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4001 - 4020 of 9,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, gives the court its first real opportunity to revisit whether government demands for data held by third parties implicates the Fourth Amendment since any of the current justices arrived on First Street. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 8:06 am by Theresa Gabaldon
Sotomayor first looked to district and appellate court cases noting that deterrence is the primary purpose of disgorgement. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:44 am by Mark Walsh
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit — during Burger’s clerk selection process. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:14 am by Howard M. Wasserman
In 2012, Sherman sued the town of Chester in state court on a host of federal and state claims, including for a regulatory taking; the town removed the case to federal district court and the case took one trip to the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:52 am by Amy Howe
In the first case, the state asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on a ruling by a three-judge district court striking down the state’s map on the ground that 28 majority-black districts were the product of racial gerrymandering, in violation of the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
The Fourth Circuit largely affirmed the district court’s injunction, applying the Establishment Clause precedent Lemon v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Josh Blackman
” The Court’s test permits judicial scrutiny of only the former. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am by Quinta Jurecic
District Court for the District of Hawaii wrote, “The Court will not crawl into a corner, pull the shutters closed, and pretend it has not seen what it has. [read post]
Supreme Court recently decided Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Kevin
Technically, the district court was the first one to use it—though only once. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
In the action against Impressions, the district court entered a stipulated judgment, holding that Lexmark’s patent rights in cartridges first sold in the United States were exhausted, but the rights were retained for cartridges first sold abroad. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
In the action against Impressions, the district court entered a stipulated judgment, holding that Lexmark’s patent rights in cartridges first sold in the United States were exhausted, but the rights were retained for cartridges first sold abroad. [read post]