Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
Texas), and national security and the First Amendment (Holder v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 2:37 am
In People v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:29 am
The Act also lists a number of factors to be considered in order to determine that a holder has not made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement.Vermont v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:29 am
The Act also lists a number of factors to be considered in order to determine that a holder has not made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement.Vermont v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:00 am
The Federal Circuit tempered this holding by citing to Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:28 pm
In the first case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:54 pm
For example, Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Association v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 9:46 pm
Eric Holder, Jr. [read post]
6 May 2014, 3:09 pm
Last month I wrote about Microsoft Corporation v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 3:00 am
R. v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:38 am
The state began garnishing his wages to that end —25 percent of his earnings each month. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
Holder that the heart of the Voting Rights Act is not “constitutional” in that sense and is not even a superstatute entitled to particular respect. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
Holder that the heart of the Voting Rights Act is not “constitutional” in that sense and is not even a superstatute entitled to particular respect. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:19 pm
Case T 647/11 Asos plc v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Roger Maier, a decision of the General Court of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) this past Tuesday, is just one piece in a rather larger jigsaw of interlocking litigation between two assertive brand owners. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:06 am
In Mozes v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm
Patently-O also analyzed two decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States that came down yesterday and relate to attorney fee-shifting in patent litigation: Octane Fitness v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 1:42 pm
In the first new decision, Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
