Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 13,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 7:16 pm
Accordingly, the Plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed Reem Properties, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:33 pm
Carcieri v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
Or lack thereof.Around a third of National Forest Service lands are inventoried roadless areas; i.e., deliberately don't have roads. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
The first thing we learned this morning with the announcement of the decision in McGirt v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:22 pm
., POET, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:58 am
City of Tigard, and other cases, the Supreme Court previously ruled that state and local governments sometimes violate the Takings Clause when they impose exactions as a condition of letting property owners develop their land. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
That holding, Judge Paez explained in his concurral opinion, flows from United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:39 pm
Our San Bernardino bankruptcy lawyers wrote in December about Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds today’s opinion in Mazdabrook Commons Homeowners’ Ass’n v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
Notable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention and Marbury v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am
In response, the Court states that neither the album itself nor its dissemination and sale have the purpose of violating anyone’s dignity or to create a humiliating or offensive environment. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 2:36 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 6:53 pm
Reece v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 10:07 pm
” Vill. of Willowbrook v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:52 am
Lands of Stone, 939 A.2d 331 (Pa. 2007); and Goldstein v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:24 pm
The state had its chance. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Ariz. 1983) (upholding NCAA sanctions for recruiting violations and denying student-athletes’ constitutiona land antitrust claims); but see Oliver v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Ariz. 1983) (upholding NCAA sanctions for recruiting violations and denying student-athletes’ constitutiona land antitrust claims); but see Oliver v. [read post]
