Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 4001 - 4020 of 156,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2025, 7:52 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Sentence reduction — Judicial impartiality Jerome Hammonds (“Appellant”) appeals from the denial of his motion for reduction of sentence. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 9:22 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Post-conviction relief — Brady violation Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Alvin Spriggs (“Spriggs”), appellant, was convicted of first-degree murder, use of […] [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 6:18 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Sentencing — Commitment record A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Andre Chavis, appellant, of various offenses, including the first-degree murder of Adrian […] [read post]
9 May 2025, 6:44 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Hearsay — Ineffective assistance of counsel On March 10, 2023, following trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, a jury found Tevin Hines, Appellant, guilty of […] [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:48 am by Derek Muller
Harper–lessons from habeas review of state courts appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm by Derek Muller
Harper… Continue reading The post Some thoughts on state power to conduct presidential primaries (and why the Moore v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:51 pm by Rick Hasen
Expect many more… Continue reading The post Expect Many More Lawsuits in Federal Court Against the Actions of State and Local Election Officials after Moore v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:00 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  The appellate opinion holds that the plaintiff’s state law claims against a federal Medicare Advantage program were preempted by the 2003 Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:22 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Jaeger (Voting Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlMendoza v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by Scott McKeown
The Court rejected this challenge (here) Patchak focused on the power of Congress to define the laws that Article III courts apply. [read post]