Search for: "State v. M. C. M."
Results 4001 - 4020
of 6,604
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2011, 11:36 pm
The impending cuts being handed down by the state legislature are truly mind-boggling in their enormity. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Elonis v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed… [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
Cuba represents a most interesting variant of Marxist-Leninist state organization. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 1:04 pm
That might be an interesting unintended consequence of this EAPA case.By Lawrence M. [read post]
Sales are Offline - Advocate General Allows for the Restriction of Third-Party Sales of Goods Online
5 Sep 2017, 1:06 am
This would be Article 4(b) and 4(c) of the Vertical Agreements Regulation. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:56 am
Circuit, Copley counsel Paul M. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled in PGA Tour v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
M. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
Pieretti v London Borough of Enfield [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 This is an odd case, in lots of ways, but what is decided in this appeal to the Court of Appeal is potentially of broader significance and certainly useful as clarification. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Family Law: Mediation; ConfidentialityAssociation de médiation familiale du Québec v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
The Magistrates had refused to state a case for the consideration of the High Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:04 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:11 am
§ 2253(c)(2); and (3) whether Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
During all of this, only the Irish High Court, as far as I'm aware, at one point explicitly indicated that there was no suggestion that the ECJ in Réunion had had the "radical intention" of laying down a broad principle (Daly v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 1:43 am
Estamos ante un auto que afronta, nada más ni nada menos, que la constitucionalidad de una de las piezas recaudatorias más efectivas de la administración tributaria, y que cuenta con figuras homólogas en la administración laboral y sectorial. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 12:43 pm
C. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
I’m also skeptical of trying to prove such biases simply by counting cases. [read post]
