Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 4001 - 4020 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am by Nedim Malovic
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are… [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:01 am by Larisa Vaysman
” (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)); Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 4:10 am
 Geisha registered Japonais with the State of Illinois, but never federally registered the mark. [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am by Stephen Wermiel
Since 1977, the Supreme Court has followed the approach dictated in Marks v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 1:16 pm by farrah nagrampa
Circuit erred in invalidating an EPA rule that implemented limits on cross-state air pollution, and Schuette v. [read post]