Search for: "State v. Quick" Results 4001 - 4020 of 4,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Employment Writes: Grainger v The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster: “Is it right that that person should be deprived of a remedy because their non-theism is wrapped up in a cloak of spaghetti? [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am by INFORRM
As the European Data Protection Regulation looms, my central premise is that some clarity and simplicity is desperately needed to avoid a chilling effect on freedom of expression, a stifling of innovation, and an online world where there is no quick and easy take-down solution for the individuals who genuinely need it. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am by Máiréad Enright
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:25 am by centerforartlaw
In the case of the De Sole trial and the Knoedler lawsuits, not one but two documentaries were produced in quick succession. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]