Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 4,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2009, 8:08 pm
In Netter v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
To use a credit card please go to the BookLocker at:http://www.booklocker.com/books/3916.html[]===========General Index of Topics Ability to perform light duty - discontinuation of GML §207-c benefitsAdministrative proceduresAge discriminationAgreement to retire.Allowing the arbitrator to exceed authorityApplicants for §207-c benefits -a "direct causal relationshipApplication for an accident disability retirement - tie vote by review boardApplications for accidental… [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
To succeed on their motion for summary judgment, the defendants were required to establish, through the submission of evidentiary proof in admissible form, that the plaintiff is unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of the cause of action (see Suydam v O'Neill, 276 AD2d 549; Ostriker v Taylor, Atkins & Ostrow, 258 AD2d 572). [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:52 pm
(Nelson v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:55 pm
., in Jacksonville, Florida, was on the winning side of Taylor v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:58 pm
State, a possession of cocaine case out of Taylor County:Appellant's opening - Stan BrownState's response - Patricia K. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:56 am
Taylor, which presented an interesting fact situation. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
Taylor Pyne Prize, the highest honor Princeton awards to an undergraduate. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:48 am
App. 1978); Taylor v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:10 am
Taylor, 458 F.3d 1201, 1204 (11th Cir. 2006) (first alteration in original) (quoting Estate of Smith v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
18 May 2009, 4:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) OT (A Child), Re [2009] EWCA Civ 409 (14 May 2009) Secretary of State for Defence v Smith, R (on the application of) [2009] EWCA Civ 441 (18 May 2009) Court of Appeal (Criminal Divison) Girma & Ors, R. v (Rev 1) [2009] EWCA Crim 912 (15 May 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Taylor v HMP [...] [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:41 am
"`Jurors are not expected to come into the jury box and leave behind all that their human experience has taught them.'" Beck v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:03 am
The most important opinion generated during the case is here: United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 6:54 am
Supreme Court Justice Byron White, in Taylor v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am
Michael Taylor, of Columbia, for Appellant.J. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:12 pm
Camilla Taylor, lead counsel for Lambda Legal in the case Varnum v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:55 pm
Taylor Gifts, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:16 am
” In 2008 the court in Taylor v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
For example, in Ting v. [read post]
