Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 4001 - 4020 of 13,931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2021, 11:29 am by Douglas Szabo
There is no such thing as an unimportant Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) opinion. [read post]
5 May 2008, 1:54 pm
Writing over at CO, Anita Krishnakumar has this fantastic new post, titled "Dejá-Vu in Begay v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 11:29 am by Douglas Szabo
There is no such thing as an unimportant Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) opinion. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:46 pm by Kirk Jenkins
During its November term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard oral argument in Grand Chapter, Order of the Eastern Star of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:50 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
He won a case the Supreme Court of the United States in a landmark constitutional law case that upholds civil rights under the First Amendment, Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 9:45 am by WSLL
THE STATE OF WYOMINGDocket Number: S-13-0250URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspxAppeal from the District Court of Laramie County the Honorable Thomas T.C. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:00 am by Karen Tani
Andrew Holowchak, Framing a Legend: Exposing the Distorted History of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings (Prometheus Books, 2013).In her State of the Field essay, "The Complicated Histories of Emancipation," Manisha Sinha (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) reviews James Oakes, Freedom National: The Destruction of Slavery in the United States, 1861–1865 (W. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Arkansas Law Review Examines the Lessons of Korematsu v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The ACLU of Massachusetts, through private counsel, successfully argued a motion to dismiss the complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute, which states in relevant part: "In any case in which a party asserts that the civil claims, counterclaims or cross claims against said party are based on said party's exercise of its right of petition under the constitution of the United States or of the commonwealth, said party may bring a special motion to dismiss." [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:21 pm by Marcus Castillo
Nonetheless, seven of the nine Justices (all but Scalia and Thomas) held open the possibility that the plaintiff’s claims could be stated under Section 502(a)(3). [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:15 am by David Markus
That was Justice Ginsburg after she was referred to as Justice O'Connor during an oral argument today in United States v. [read post]