Search for: "US v. Davis" Results 4001 - 4020 of 4,721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by Jeff Hermes
The upcoming changes will ensure that our work continues in a robust and sustainable fashion, and so, while those of us here are a bit melancholy to see the end of an era, we are hopeful for what comes next. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Two primary sources of guidance: SCt’s unanimous 2012 decision in Hosanna Taber v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:58 am by Steve McConnell
We like it when movies or books keep us in suspense. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The recent injunction row, PJS v NGN is in many ways a sequel to the 2011 blockbuster – CTB v NGN and Thomas – set in the Super Injunction Spring, the story of Imogen Thomas, a former Miss Wales who had an affair with the Premier League footballer Ryan Giggs. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on Wednesday 11 December 2024, the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Nicola Davies and Dingemans LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Prismall v Google [2024] EWCA Civ 1516. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am by Will Baude
"[E]arly American courts did not use the term 'standing' much . . . . [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 09541-19 Brown v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07929-19 Dunn v Liverpool Echo,1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuges (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03690-19 Davies v The Jewish Chronicle,1 Accuracy (2018). [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics 1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor   Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and  Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment 1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William   On Conveyancers' Evidence 1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas   On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Court held possession of a gun was not economic (in Lopez), but that possession of marijuana for home use was (in Gonzales v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Daniel Spiegel
Prevatte, 346 N.C. 162, 163 (1997), discussed by my colleague, Phil, here (following Davis v. [read post]