Search for: "United States v. Brown"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 4,557
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2009, 5:57 pm
Brown 128 S.Ct. 2408 (2008) - California law that anyone who receives more than $10,000 from the state can't use those funds to engage in anti-union activity. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 12:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
United States, 370 U.S. 294 (1962), that the antitrust laws are designed to protect competition, not competitors). [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 3:40 am
Brown v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:13 pm
Conservative social movement activity explains the sluggish move to integrate public schools after the landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Mary Queen of the Third Millennium, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:36 pm
At the time of the merger, Whole Foods operated 194 stores in 37 states, the District of Columbia and the United Kingdom. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:20 am
United States, a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suit the couple filed three years ago in the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:19 am
Federation of States Medical Boards of the United States Inc.U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
â€5 The site’s “Facebook Principles†state that a user may “set up a personal profile, form relationships, perform searches and queries, form groups, set up events, add applications and transmit information through various channels. [read post]
Civil Rights Expert, Professor Leland Ware, Publishes Book with Foreward by Vice President Joe Biden
29 Mar 2009, 9:21 pm
An overview of the book follows: The Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 9:58 am
In Brown v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:31 pm
This up-to-date analysis includes: A practical explanation of Section 468B settlement funds; When and how to use them; Statutory and regulatory background for designated settlement funds (DSFs) and qualified settlement funds (QSFs); Discussion of the Tenth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:47 am
Yesterday we filed this cert. amicus brief on behalf of the National Association of Assistant United States Attorneys and the National District Attorneys Association in No. 08-1065, Pottawattamie County, Iowa v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sentence is remanded for resentencing in light of Amendment 709 to the United States Sentencing Guideline U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:57 am
John v. [read post]
