Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 4,263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
The United States isn’t the only country working on cybersecurity reform: over in Germany, draft legislation has been shared publicly, and Paul got his hands on an English language summary of the proposal. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:47 am
Both Courts focused on the language of Section 111 which defines a cable system as follows: A “cable system” is a facility, located in any State, territory, trust territory, or possession of the United States, that in whole or in part receives signals transmitted or programs broadcast by one or more television broadcast stations licensed by the Federal Communications Commission, and makes secondary transmissions of such signals or programs by wires, cables,… [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
United States ((1971) 29 Law Ed. 822= 403 U.S. 713) Let’s see if this constitutional challenge goes any far. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:37 am
Unauthorized Access to his former employer’s Computers In support of the “no unauthorized access” argument, Nosal argued that: (1) under the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in this case (United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
Ashcroft (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 10-98). [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm
Ginsburg also reported that the administration of the death penalty in the United States is now limited to a handful of counties in five states and that the number of executions has declined from 98 in 1999 to 20 in 2016. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:58 pm
And given the ostensible justification -- stated fears of trying these particular defendants on American soil -- the changes would undermine the authority and legitimacy of all federal courts in the United States.? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:11 am
The agreement states that this discount is "in recognition of additional legal hurdles facing U.S. residents who purchased Satyam ordinary shares on markets outside the United States in seeking to recover under federal securities laws. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Next month, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
Check out Scott Greenfield's post on Berghuis v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:53 am
All of the amounts required to be paid by this Code section shall be paid in lawful money of the United States to the purchaser at the tax sale or to the purchaser’s successors. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:54 pm
Surely, one might think, it would be able to earn a trillion dollars, a fraction of what is at stake in dollars and lives in the United States alone. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
Derived from the case United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:40 am
Holder, decided nearly three years ago. [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:37 am
[single citation] In a 2004 decision (SOCAN v. [read post]
