Search for: "United States v. West" Results 4001 - 4020 of 4,130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2007, 12:43 pm
Soledad cross, even though he was not on Hunter's staff.In Trunk v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
April 2004 CanadaAbstractAlthough some studies suggest positive effects of treatment for sexual offenders, most studies have been hampered by the unknown influence of selective attrition (e.g., volunteers and drop-outs). [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 9:16 am
  A  federal antitrust  class action pending against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California called Rodriguez, et. al v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 3:44 am
" Leckie Smokeless Coal Co., 99 F.3d at 585.It is also true that, after our own district court issued its judgment, and while the case was pending on appeal to this court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reached a decision in accord with that of the West Virginia district court. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599 A7936 Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598 A7905 Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597 A7892 Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in… [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
  I think that provisions  (viii) to (xi), along with anything not listed above, are investor favorable and not as typical  in West Coast venture financings. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 10:40 am
The remaining Wild West in the contemporary United States fails to be untouched by our modern legal system. [read post]