Search for: "WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 4,153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the position of the USDA and the meat industry, doing so in a way that was as nonsensical as it was sexist. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
Similarly, referring to the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, Justice Peter McClellan and Christopher Beshara claim that ‘[i]n spite of the distasteful subject matter with which it sometimes deals, the court can occasionally be the source of humour’. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:47 pm
Wisconsin Judicare, Inc. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
The parties to the underlying action settled during post trial appeals. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
Jack Smith Appeals Judge Cannon Decision to Throw Out Trump Case MSN – Perry Stein and Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 8/26/2024 Special counsel Jack Smith urged an appeals court to reverse U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Court let the law remain in effect pending an appeal of a federal district court decision blocking the law. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. affirmed the ruling. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled the group had a reasonable fear of drawing a complaint about its spending without registering, and, therefore, had the ability to sue over the campaign finance law. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm
It is also inconsistent with this Court’s precedents. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:01 am
A one-judge Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision (2014) reversed. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:17 am
The content of the TheDirty website can be characterized as offensive and misogynistic, appealing to a particular audience, and as TheDirty has proven, a site of its nature can use the CDA to shield itself from civil liability for the third party content that it hosts. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:06 pm
In 1974, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the position of the USDA and the meat industry, doing so in a way that was as nonsensical as it was sexist. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:25 pm
In 1974, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the position of the USDA and the meat industry, doing so in a way that was as nonsensical as it was sexist. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:59 am
In 1974, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the position of the USDA and the meat industry, doing so in a way that was as nonsensical as it was sexist. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:22 am
In 1974, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the position of the USDA and the meat industry, doing so in a way that was as nonsensical as it w [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:50 pm
The Wisconsin Supreme Court in Kriefall v Excel called it as it saw it – at least with respect to E. coli – but the analysis is spot on for Salmonella as well: The E. coli strain that killed Brianna and made the others sick is a “deleterious substance which may render [meat] injurious to health. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:01 am
This Madras decision stands in contrast to a 2009 Bombay High Court decision and has been appealed to the Supreme Court, which issued an interim order on July 4, 2012. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The court also noted that an appellate court in Wisconsin had rejected Alexander’s theory, in construing a similar statute in State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am
The Wisconsin Supreme Court in Kriefall v Excel called it as it saw it – at least with respect to E. coli – but the analysis is spot on for Salmonella as well: The E. coli strain that killed Brianna and made the others sick is a “deleterious substance which may render [meat] injurious to health. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Delaware – Supreme Court Rules in Former State Auditor Kathy McGuiness’ Criminal Conviction Appeal Yahoo News – Xerxes Wilson (Delaware News Journal) | Published: 2/13/2024 The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the misdemeanor conflict-of-interest conviction of former state Auditor Kathy McGuiness while overturning her other misdemeanor conviction, remanding that charge for a potential second trial. [read post]
