Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2007, 9:34 am
However, I don't support prosecuting and convicting innocent men and women with shaky, indirect, circumstantial evidence.My degree is not in journalism, so I can't speak to the merits or motives of John Grisham. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:45 pm
Innocent non-Americans don't even get the limited and much abused protections the NSA promises for Americans. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:54 am
Not only does it implicate the deliberative process, but it costs time, money, and finality, as it becomes yet another tactical weapon for lawyers to use when they don't like a verdict. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:32 am
I'd argue that photographing physical items, including documents, produces a less than complete version of the original item, which I don't think undermines the Jefferson judge's analysis. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
We can't have a world, he said, where the day after the FDA says you may distribute this drug with this label, the manufacturer can run in and change the label. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:28 am
The court held that general allegations of off-label promotion don't cut it, since doctors may lawfully prescribe medicines for off-label purposes and, although off-label promotion may violate an FDA regulation, it is not inherently false. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Are there things that don’t make sense? [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:59 am
You want crime lab administrators, much less line staff, outside the command and control of law enforcement because you don't want them to have a stake in the outcome. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm
From Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion yesterday in The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
Litman: can we persuade courts that there unauthorized uses that don’t threaten value? [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:38 am
Of course, defendants don't get interlocutory appeals, so if the judge granted it inadvertently, the defendant is screwed.Of course, not everybody is in favor of this law. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
I just don't know any analogue for that. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:41 pm
Don't bother answering. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
I really can't understand why district judges don't give a unanimity instruction in every case--it wouldn't hurt in a single act case and would absolutely prevent reversals of convictions. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:36 am
I don't think they're tough enough and I don't think it will give my opponent the right impression of the power I want to project. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 2:16 pm
Typically evidentiary errors don't get you habeas relief. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 1:51 am
They don't prepare. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:23 am
"In essence, what they're doing is they're targeting non-capital states and imposing their will in a state where the people have spoken and said, 'We don't want the death penalty,' " said prominent criminal defense attorney Anthony Chambers, who has handled federal death penalty cases. [read post]
13 May 2009, 7:12 am
I guess there's not really a problem, then.And pstt, don't tell Obama, but Judge Shepherd has empathy with a capital E:I empathize with PD-11's argument that its attorneys are overworked and under-resourced. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:19 am
If you look at the entire package, I don’t think there’s a lot of ambiguity. [read post]
