Search for: "Wellness Indicators, Inc."
Results 4001 - 4020
of 7,773
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
As indicated in the editor’s preface, the State Bar of Texas was in the forefront of providing service to its members. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:30 am
The agency also has not indicated whether it is seeking an outside, independent entity to conduct the review. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 pm
As well, they understand that it is necessary to view a website to determine whose site it is. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 4:53 pm
See Moose Creek, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
It may well be foreseeable that competitors will mimic a product design or label. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:30 am
The lawsuit asserts claims of patent infringement, trademark infringement, as well as false and deceptive labeling and unfair competition. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am
Predictions: A well known quote of John Wayne is “Out here, due process is a bullet. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:00 pm
Courtney Minick is an attorney, blogger, and product manager at Justia, Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:34 pm
Sud-Chemie Inc. in concluding the five year statute of limitations applies. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:55 am
"And so the Board affirmed the genericness refusal, as well as the alternative mere descriptiveness refusal under Section 2(e)(1).Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Likewise, one might well conclude that at least some businesses of a religious nature should have a right to religious freedom. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:13 am
Whitehall Labs., Inc., 874 F. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
Harry Winston, Inc. and Harry Winston S.A. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 3:48 pm
Finally, Bontrager alleged negligent misrepresentation, but his allegations on damages fall short on this claim as well. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
This did not fare well for Harry Winston, Inc., and its Swiss entity Harry Winston S.A., (“Opposers”) which opposed the registration of the mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, claiming that the BRUCE WINSTON mark so resembles trade marks WINSTON and HARRY WINSTON for jewelry that it would likely cause confusion. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
Darden Restaurants, Inc., Case No. 13-CV-5244 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:13 am
Wyeth, Inc., 85 Cal. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
The post How Well Are Your Claims Performing? [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 1:16 am
A couple of years ago an operation called ivi, Inc., which provided an Internet-delivered system for streaming over-the-air programming and claimed it was a cable system, didn’t make it out of the starting gate. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:34 am
BJ Thompson Associates, Inc. leased an office from Jubilee Investment Corp. [read post]
