Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 29,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
Estis Well Service, 768 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2014) held that punitive damages were not available under the rationale of an earlier Supreme Court case, Miles v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 8:10 pm
A recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in R. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
On 1 May 2024, a lawsuit in the federal courts of Virginia: Maya Parizer et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Then, in a case of first impression, McKithen v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
- At Concurring Opinions, Thomas Crocker considers Justice Alito’s use of the term “privacy” in his opinion for the Court in Kentucky v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 1:12 pm
In that decision, Biden v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court, in Packingham v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Much has been written over the past weeks about the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Uber v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:47 am
§ 1512 US v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:52 am
Although discussed in Justice Breyer's concurrence, the Supreme Court explicitly left the issue open in Textron, and it remained unresolved by subsequent courts of appeals. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:36 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently heard an appeal of Justice Nakatsuru’s decision in R. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:47 pm
Frederick (06-278), a clear majority of the Justices showed significant skepticism about creating a wide exception to the curb on suppression of student speech that the Court spelled out in 1969 in Tinker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:28 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in Sebelius v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:11 am
On its way to the Supreme Court, a district court dismissed Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:56 am
He challenged this as well, upon the basis that the underlying predicate conduct, having the weapon at home in available and operable condition, was consistent with his Second Amendment rights per Heller.The Court held: In view of D.C. v. [read post]
