Search for: "Antonin Scalia"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 6,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion for the 7-2 majority, which included the Court’s entire liberal wing as well as Chief Justice John Roberts and (with one relatively small exception, about which I shall have more to say below) Justice Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:35 pm
I have a habit of skimming a book by Bryan Garner and Justice Antonin Scalia before any appeallate argument . [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:42 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas, in a separate opinion joined by Justice Antonin Scalia, would have answered the constitutional question that the Court had agreed to hear in this case, and declare that prosecutors could have used the suspect’s silence against him at the trial even if he had specifically claimed a Fifth Amendment right. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm
Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan, Fabulosity, Federal Judges, Jane Roberts, Jane Sullivan Roberts, Joanna F. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
Joining Chief Justice Roberts in dissent were Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:16 am
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: 14th Amendment, 4th Amendment, Akhil Amar, Akhil Reed Amar, American Constitution Society (ACS), Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Conferences / Symposia, Constitutional Law, DNA, Fourteenth Amendment, Fourth Amendment, John Paul Stevens, Maryland v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:10 am
Justice Scalia announces the opinion this morning (Art Lien) For those who would look to Congress to keep open, and expand, the right to vote for the presidency and for members of Congress, Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion for a majority (seven to two on several points, six to three on one other very key point) promised that Congress could pass its own laws on the voter registration process, and states would have to yield to those. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:03 am
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the 7-2 opinion. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:03 am
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the 7-2 opinion. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:03 am
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the 7-2 opinion. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the 7-2 opinion. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:20 pm
” Justice Thomas wrote a dissent, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:10 am
In addition, he clerked for several judges including Antonin Scalia, practiced law at Davis, Polk, and Wardwell, and served as Chief Economist for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:56 am
Many readers no doubt will share the view of Justice Antonin Scalia, in a short, separate opinion refusing to join in a section “going into the fine details of molecular biology,” of which he said he had neither knowledge or belief. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:07 pm
Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia blithely dismissed adhesion contracts with the observation that “the times in which consumer contracts were anything other than adhesive are long past” (AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
And Justice Antonin Scalia seemed to argue that the Court needed to step in and overturn the law because members of Congress were too afraid of the stigma that might result from voting against the Voting Rights Act, whether it is needed or not. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
The Justices did not all agree here: there is a powerful dissenting opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, for example. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:26 am
Those are Justice Antonin Scalia’s words, taken from Monday’s eye-opening dissent in Maryland v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:10 am
The dissent was sort of "Nino and the Ladies", with Justice Antonin Scalia being joined by the three female Justices, Sotomayor, Ginsberg and Kagan. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:46 am
King, upholding the constitutionality of a Maryland law that authorizes DNA testing for individuals arrested for “serious offenses,” on Monday afternoon Justice Antonin Scalia doffed his black robe and returned to the courtroom for a very different event: the thirty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Supreme Court Historical Society, where he joined his co-author, Bryan Garner, to discuss their latest book together, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. [read post]
