Search for: "Battle v. State" Results 4021 - 4040 of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm by Michael Reiter, Attorney at Law
He next shows up at the February 6, 1989 San Bernardino Mayor and Common Council Meeting (from the minutes:) PUBLIC COMMENTS – THE SWORD A citizen, identifying himself as the Anti-Christ, also known as the Sword, Commander-in-Chief of the House of Ying during the battle of Armageddon, stated that the taping of all meetings of the Mayor and Common Council is [sic] required to be announced according to the Supreme Court decision of Davis v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit applied the test outlined by Justice Anthony Kennedy in Rapanos v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:03 pm by Jack Vrett
Last month, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) heard oral arguments in the important case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Antebellum Case Law on the Right to Arms Under State and Federal ConstitutionsA right to carry weapons openly for self-defenseNunn v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:08 am
Sergeants like Ray Girouard recognized almost immediately something was wrong and worked furiously to restore sanity and restraint to a battle field where confusion blinded the confused. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
"AFBF President Bob Stallman states in the release, "Allowing the lower court ruling to stand would pose serious challenges to farmers battling pests . . .any length of time waiting for permit approval for products that are already approved would be disastrous [in the case of a pest outbreak]. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:57 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: For many, the 2011 case of Walmart v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Scott Calvert report that “[t]he Supreme Court is facing a sensitive choice on whether to intervene in a partisan battle over Pennsylvania’s congressional map,” noting that “[t]he state court based its ruling on the Pennsylvania Constitution, a move that would normally leave the U.S. [read post]