Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 4021 - 4040
of 8,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2007, 6:01 pm
The big news tomorrow today is going to be oral argument scheduled before the Supreme Court in Elizabeth Kerrigan et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Apart from its import for U.S. detention policy generally, the development, if true, may have bearing on the factual underpinnings in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 701 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1997) and Buenoano v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
City of Farmers Branch, Texas v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:54 am
Such fears justify the general presumption of regularity, the normal rule against probing the mental states of busy executive-branch actors. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:51 pm
Yesterday, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled against the Trump administration in an important sanctuary city case, City of Chicago v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm
The understanding of “public bodies” in our FoI law varies from all governmental branches in the executive, judiciaries and the legislative, to political parties, state-owned enterprises, non-governmental organizations and other legal entities receiving funding from the state or regional budget.Not all information can be disclosed, however. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 2:18 pm
Articles and speech transcripts published in law reviews “Defense Presence and Participation: A Procedural Minimum for Batson v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
Then it concludes: “the Executive Branch determines whether the United States will recognize foreign states and governments and their territorial bounds. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm
This brief reminds the Court that, even in its Filartiga and Kadic briefs, the Executive branch expressed concerns about allowing U.S. courts to exercise jurisdiction where the alleged conduct and the parties had minimal connection to the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:35 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:03 am
In 2020, the appeals court reaffirmed this double standard in Lopez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 9:47 am
As the recent case of Pinero v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 11:59 am
These requirements grew more demanding as the State Department publicly documented R [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:33 am
Last week the Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:05 am
Federal and state judiciaries, led by the U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
Marbury v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm
According to Bickel, the Court’s ability to decline to exercise jurisdiction otherwise given helps the Court to respond to the limits of its countermajoritarian role and institutional competence, even though it also underscores the difficulty of reconciling certiorari with Chief Justice Marshall’s statements in Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Lance v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 7:28 pm
The case, Fischer v. [read post]
